curiousher: (Upside down)
+ ALICE + ([personal profile] curiousher) wrote2010-03-05 01:04 am
Entry tags:

M e s s a g e 1 0

This is all terribly confusing! There's something very fishy here, and it's not any kind of fish I ever saw. It's a confusing fish of a different name altogether. Like Bruce, or Isabelle, or Marzipan. Those aren't names for fishes at all!

Who are you all? Are you who you've been saying you've been being? Are you all some kind of fishes that have been walking about on land? Well, you're going to get everything all wet if you keep doing that! What kind of fish are you anyway?

Maybe I'm not even Alice! Maybe I've been a fish all this time!

Excuse me, could one of you fishes tell me what sorts of sounds I'm supposed to be making? I don't think I've ever heard a fish. Is it a glub-glub sort of noise?

Re: ooc

[identity profile] talks-to-fish.livejournal.com 2010-03-05 01:43 pm (UTC)(link)
No, thanks, it's good!

- Would they have the knowledge of the person that they hate? Because Jeb knows almost all the things that Angels wants to find out about... so... is it possible to have them leak that knowledge out to someone else, so other people can tell them about it afterwards?

Re: ooc

[identity profile] curiousher.livejournal.com 2010-03-05 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
- I'm going to say no on that one. I understand the reasoning behind it, and for people whose hated person isn't in the mansion it would be fine, but if we said it was okay for everyone, I think that would probably count as godmodding, which is generally considered not good. We can't really give the characters information they don't already have. It will probably wind up more like your character's impression of the person the hate. It also works out for characters that hate some one but don't know the "real" side of them. They won't magically know that information, they'll just be acting like how they would assume they would act. Does that make sense?